No two caregivers are alike, and
neither are their situations, yet there is one commonality which
exists among all of them, whether they are caring for someone within
the home, or as a long distance caregiver, and that is the constant
worry about a loved one falling when they are alone. Injuries caused
by falls are a common occurrence among the elderly. Studies report
that 30% of people who are over the age of 65 (about 35 million
Americans) fall every year, and that these incidences increase to
50% for those over the age of 80. It’s been estimated that at least
60% of all falls occur in the home, with another 30% happening in
public places, and 10% taking place in healthcare institutions.
There are also 26 million people with neuromuscular or cognitive
diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, epilepsy, multiple
sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, ALS and even diabetes who fall even
more frequently. The data reported about those over 65 is probably
quite conservative, since many of these falls go unreported, because
many people may think that falling is a normal part of aging
process, or because they may be unable to realize what has happened
to them due to a condition such as Alzheimer’s. They may also not
report a fall due to being embarrassed, or because they fear that if
others know that they have fallen, their activities and independence
may then be greatly restricted.
Whatever the reasoning, the
danger still exists for someone who has taken a fall, especially if
they are elderly and alone. For those who are unable to get up from
a fall, the amount of time they spend immobile will greatly affect
the outcome of their health and rehabilitation. In other words, a
fall that results in a serious injury may signify the beginning of
declining health that may become an irreversible, downward spiral.
Even 90% of the falls that don’t result in injury may have a
detrimental impact on the health and well-being of a loved one.
While the best strategy for caregivers can be found in forms of
prevention, it’s still nearly impossible to know what’s really going
on with a loved one when they are on their own. The next-best-thing
to help caregivers in their struggle to prevent falls may be found
in technology. While a computer or a machine may not have the
physical prowess to stop someone from falling, they can be used to
determine when someone has fallen, greatly reducing the amount of
time the person may have normally spent on the floor, with their
health situation rapidly declining while waiting for help.
The latest in “electronic”
caregiving technology can be found with the advent of the personal
emergency response system or PERS. The way in which a typical PERS
works is a person wears an electronic pendant, either around the
neck or wrist, which they press immediately upon any type of
emergency, whether they’ve had a fall, think that they may be
suffering from a heart attack, or fear that an intruder is on the
premises. When pressed, the pendant works as a transmitter
contacting a regular telephone system, automatically dialing
emergency agencies such as the police department, fire department,
or even a family member or neighbor. This works well when a person
isn’t unconscious and has the ability to communicate what their
particular emergency is, but what about those who may fall and lose
consciousness, or for those who may be having some other physical
problem which renders them unable to speak and explain what they
need? Some PERS companies are testing the potential for a new device
which would actually detect the physical action of a person falling.
Currently being utilized is a small, pager-like device worn around
the abdomen and clipped to a pair of pants, or attached to a velcro
belt that has a special pouch. The device must be worn around the
torso in order to pick up the accelerated signals the body will
produce when it is at an awkward angle, such as in the case of a
fall.
If you’re unconscious or unable
to send the signal on your own, it will work the same way as if you
had pressed the button on an emergency pendant: the belt clip device
detects a fall, or the user can press the button for help, even if
they have not fallen; the signal is then sent to the base unit in
the home; the base unit calls the monitoring center; two-way
communication between the base unit and the monitoring center will
be attempted; the monitoring center will then call someone on the
contact list; if none of the contacts can be reached, emergency
services in their area will be dispatched. Still in its infancy,
these devices have areas that are already being studied for
improvement, such as the life of the battery, which has a short
life- span presently, trying to somehow create the device to be
waterproof so that it may be worn in the shower (one of the most
common places to have a serious fall), and to also decrease the
amount of false-positives (times when the device reports a fall that
hasn’t really occurred).
The sky’s the limit for the
future of this device that will one day accurately detect when
someone has fallen, along with monitoring other situations as well.
Many of America’s top technology companies are presently creating
and experimenting with thousands of pieces of remote monitoring
equipment. One of the biggest challenges these companies are
experiencing is that robotics, monitors, and machines are unable to
recognize what would be considered “normal” behavior in each person,
their activities of daily living, and/or any variations in their
routine or environment. In order for technology to be able to detect
these subtle changes in the day-to-day life of a human, a whole new
level of development must be reached in creating and testing such
adaptive devices. The long-term goal is to invent advanced computing
techniques for automatic configuration, filtering, trending,
adaptive modeling, and pattern recognition that will have the
ability to perceive changes of interest to caregivers, ultimately
helping to reduce their own stress level, along with providing a
guaranteed safety mechanism. Another goal is for a successful device
to have the same amount of cost-effectiveness as the current safety
and PERS equipment has, as well as being just as easy to use. It
will take some time to overcome certain obstacles, such as the fact
that current motion sensors can only tell that somebody may be in a
room, however, the identity of the person and their precise location
in the room can not be definitively discerned. Also, while these new
devices will probably rely heavily upon the use of existing security
systems, the infrastructure of such systems will need to be greatly
overhauled through highly improved technology, because they are
presently set up to detect only simple events, and lack the ability
to recognize complex patterns and trends over time.
Some of the systems being tested
are using wireless security sensors along with a security panel, and
have all been proven to work well so far. These systems are easy to
install and configure. The sensors used include micro door sensors,
motion sensors, and door/window sensors. All sensors are battery
powered and communicate with the panel wirelessly. Sensors cover
three specific points in the home: 1) exterior doors, 2) kitchen
use, 3) motion throughout the residence. Kitchen use is monitored
with both motion sensors, and micro door sensors (small open/close
detection sensors) mounted on the refrigerator, silverware drawer,
and on a commonly used food cupboard or pantry. The data
transmission uses a two-way page modem in the security panel, which
pages all events to a central location using the two-way page
network. Although some geographic constraints may exist regarding
the use of the system and where it may be placed, the sensors
located in specific areas around the home still provide easy
installation and affordable data collection. The system includes a
password-protected secure web-site that caregivers can use to check
in on the homes of elderly or physically challenged loved ones. The
door sensors work well if someone with Alzheimer’s tries to wonder
from the home, and some of the sensors placed in the kitchen can
actually help monitor a person’s eating habits, so that caregivers
will be able to know if they are really getting nourishment, and
more specifically, which foods they are consuming. The results from
all this testing have built an exciting foundation for in-home
monitoring of those with physical challenges, illness, or who are
elderly. All of this will undoubtedly help to lower caregiver
stress, as well as saves lives, and the good news is that this
future of PERS is closer than we realize.